Criticism of EFCC Chair’s Press Briefing on Yahaya Bello by Bwala
Lawyer and public affairs analyst, Daniel Bwala, has expressed his disapproval of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for their accusations against former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello.
Bwala, who is a member of the Peoples Democratic Party’s Presidential Campaign Committee for the 2023 general elections, criticized the agency’s “trial by media” approach. He condemned the recent press briefing by EFCC chairman, Olanipekun Olukoyede, stating that the agency was conducting public discussions as if it were a courtroom trial, with the media acting as judge and jury.
During an appearance on Arise TV’s morning show, Bwala raised concerns about the fairness of the commission’s actions, questioning whether they were genuinely seeking prosecution or inadvertently providing an escape route for the accused.
He pointed out inconsistencies in the EFCC’s procedures and accused the chairman of breaching the protocols of the anti-graft commission. Bwala also criticized the EFCC for allegedly orchestrating a negative narrative against ex-governor Bello through the media instead of relying on legal proceedings.
He emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and urged the EFCC to respect the legal process. Bwala highlighted the need for reforms within the anti-corruption commission, criticizing its focus on media attention rather than effective prosecution.
As the situation surrounding Yahaya Bello’s case continues to unfold, Bwala stressed the significance of upholding the rule of law and the rights of the accused. He emphasized the need for the EFCC to prioritize legal proceedings over sensationalism in the media.
Consider this scenario: if the court rules that your request to revoke the arrest order is now irrelevant because you are already present, then all is well. Alternatively, if the court determines that you are not present, the arrest order will likely be extended, potentially leading to a bench warrant issuance due to your absence. Should the court revoke the order, you can proceed to trial.
Essentially, irrespective of the outcome, the coin’s value remains constant. Just like a 10 kobo coin retains its worth regardless of the side, a change in value prompts a focus on each side’s distinct characteristics.
Let’s focus on the present situation, avoiding speculation on the application’s success or failure as it falls within the court’s purview. When parties subject themselves to the court’s jurisdiction, it’s crucial to maintain the status quo until the court provides direction.
If the EFCC continues pursuing the individual vigorously, it may overshadow the genuine prosecution process, especially after serving the charges.
After arraignment, proper preparation is key for the prosecution, including delivery of an open address or setting a trial date.
In a recent media interview, the individual’s actions seemed to contradict fundamental principles, portraying a disproportionate application.
Firstly, the notion of accessing someone through a backdoor for an interview raises questions, contrary to the principle of equality before the law.
Secondly, the eagerness to make an arrest contrasts with handling similar cases where arrests have not been made despite having preliminary indictments.