Dr. Babatunde Ajayi, the General Manager of the Lagos State Environmental Protection Agency, discusses the recent styrofoam ban in the state and the agency’s initiatives to combat pollution across Lagos with VICTOR AYENI.
Why was the ban on styrofoam and single-use plastics implemented by the Lagos State Government?
The ban was prompted by the extensive environmental degradation caused by styrofoam. The accumulation of styrofoam in drains results in blockages, causing water to spill onto roads even in dry weather. This leads to rapid road erosion, vehicle damage, and heightened accident risks. Removing styrofoam from Lagos’ waste stream would reduce it by 50%, easing these environmental repercussions and promoting safer road conditions.
Was the potential negative impact on businesses and livelihoods considered before implementing the ban?
Yes, considerations were made. Stakeholder engagements were conducted, and specific timelines and conditions were agreed upon for enforcing the ban. Efforts have been made to mitigate the effects on businesses, especially restaurants and food vendors who can explore sustainable alternatives like reusable plastics and paper packs.
Were stakeholders consulted before announcing the ban?
Certainly, stakeholders, including manufacturers, sellers, and importers of styrofoam, were engaged in advocacy visits. The decision to ban styrofoam aligns with international trends where many countries have already prohibited its use in food packaging, indicating the necessity for Lagos to act accordingly.
What has been the financial impact of styrofoam usage on the state government?
The financial toll is substantial, spanning road network deterioration, drainage maintenance costs, and health-related expenses such as clearing canals clogged with styrofoam, which also contributes to health risks like malaria and cholera. Additionally, flooded areas pose threats, with instances of individuals, including children, being swept away during floods due to blocked drainages.
How will the ban affect canal clearing costs?
The ban is projected to significantly reduce the expenses incurred by the government for clearing canals, as well as minimize the potential damages from floods. The monetary gains from styrofoam trading pale in comparison to the costs associated with canal maintenance and flood management.
Has the state government suggested viable alternatives to styrofoam for food establishments?
Alternatives like paper packs, leaves, and reusable plastics have been recommended for food packaging. Transitioning to serving food on glass plates in restaurants would also diminish the need for styrofoam. Embracing these sustainable practices is essential for aligning with global standards and reducing environmental pollution.
Will there be penalties for those who defy the ban and continue using styrofoam?
Enforcement measures will be in place, ensuring compliance with the ban. Those in violation will face consequences for their actions.
What strategies has LASEPA devised to address environmental challenges in the state?
LASEPA has intensified advocacy and enforcement activities, engaging various sectors, including religious organizations and the entertainment industry. Emphasis has been placed on combating water pollution, with plans to enhance air quality monitoring and reduce environmental pollution from sources like generators and cooking methods.
Have there been measures taken to curb noise pollution in the state?
We have shut down 148 establishments contributing to noise pollution. Reopening these locations demands considerable efforts to reduce their noise levels, including imposing restrictions on opening hours in residential areas to mitigate disturbances during sleeping hours.