Analyst argues for FIFA to consider eliminating the March international break due to injuries and loss of momentum

Fans can rejoice as there will not be another international break until the end of this football season.

FIFA typically utilizes these periods for qualifiers and play-offs during the campaign.

However, the March break is often filled with international friendlies.

Instead of complaining to national teams, clubs have found ways to protect their players.

For example, Arsenal withdrew Takehiro Tomiyasu and Thomas Partey from Japan and Ghana’s matches respectively.

Even though Bukayo Saka joined the England squad, he did not play against Brazil or Belgium.

In contrast, Declan Rice played full 180 minutes in those games.

Arsenal, leading the Premier League, will face Manchester City this Sunday.

Kevin De Bruyne stayed behind to recover from injury, Kyle Walker was injured in Brazil’s match, and John Stones had limited playing time against Belgium. Manuel Akanji also sustained an injury while playing for Switzerland.

Despite fan suspicions about these injuries, some of these players are expected to feature in the upcoming important match at The Etihad.

It’s understandable that clubs prioritize the fitness of their key players during this crucial stage of the season, whether they are competing for titles, European berths, or avoiding relegation.

Oluwagbenga Adava, a broadcaster with Breez FM in Akure, highlights the dilemma between morality and legality.

Adava comments: “The situation raises questions of legality versus morality.

“While it may seem unethical, it is not illegal.

“As we approach the business end of the season, every point is crucial for teams vying for titles, European qualification, or survival.

“There have been instances where clubs reached agreements with national teams. For instance, Portugal allowed Dias and Bernardo to return to City after just one friendly match.

“Considering the upcoming crucial matches, clubs like City prioritizing player well-being is justifiable, especially after recent injuries suffered by Stones and Walker while on international duty.”

“FIFA compensates clubs for long-term injuries sustained by players on international duty, acknowledging the risks involved.”

Should FIFA reconsider abolishing the March international break?

Adava believes: “From a fan’s perspective, yes. March marks the peak of the season.

“International breaks disrupt player fitness, club momentum, and more.

“Factoring in long-haul flights, jet lag, and the risk of player injuries that could derail their season, I believe the break should be scrapped.

“Players have already expressed concerns about the crowded fixture list.”